SKU: 40833705732

ST X Gewindefahrwerk Stahl verzinkt (mit fester Kennung) passend für Ford Focus ST MKIII

$383.69 $426.32
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on ateurope.org >

Pay in installments of $106.58 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

ST X Gewindefahrwerk Stahl verzinkt (mit fester Kennung) passend für Ford Focus ST MKIIIST X Stahl verzinkt Tieferlegung VA HA (mm) : 25 40 20 35 Die ST X Gewindefahrwerke erlauben durch die stufenlose Gewindeverstellung eine moderate bis eXtreme Tieferlegung. Basierend auf dem Knowhow von KW, dem Marktfhrer fr individuelle Fahrwerklsungen, berzeugen die ST X Gewindefahrwerke durch ihre Qualitt und Fahrdynamik. Die ST X Gewindefahrwerke made by KW lassen sich schnell und einfach ber das Trapezgewinde am verzinkten und mehrfach

ST X Stahl verzinkt

 

Tieferlegung VA/HA (mm) :     25-40/20-35

 

 

Die ST X Gewindefahrwerke erlauben durch die stufenlose Gewindeverstellung eine moderate bis eXtreme Tieferlegung. Basierend auf dem Knowhow von KW, dem Marktführer für individuelle Fahrwerklösungen, überzeugen die ST X Gewindefahrwerke durch ihre Qualität und Fahrdynamik.

Die ST X Gewindefahrwerke made by KW lassen sich schnell und einfach über das Trapezgewinde am verzinkten und mehrfach versiegeltem Federbein im Niveau der Tieferlegung justieren. Dazu wird im eingebauten Zustand der ST Polyamid-Gewindefederring nach oben oder unten gedreht. Der Verstellbereich ist bei jedem Fahrzeug unterschiedlich, so liegt er etwa beim Audi A3 an der Vorder- und Hinterachse zwischen 35 und 65 mm. Bei einem bereits im Serienzustand relativ tiefen Fahrzeug wie zum Beispiel dem BMW 3er (E9x), können mit dem ST X Gewindefahrwerk individuelle Tieferlegungen im Bereich von 30 bis 60 mm vorne und 25 bis 55 mm hinten erzielt werden. Bei Fahrzeugen mit nicht-radführenden Doppelquerlenker-Hinterachsen wird die Tieferlegung über die ST X Gewindefahrwerke Hinterachs-Höhenverstellung eingestellt.

Eine Dämpferabstimmung für mehr Fahrspaß
Bei der von ST Suspensions in Zusammenarbeit mit KW genutzten Dämpfersetup steht eine sportliche Abstimmung im Fokus. Dadurch verringern sich beim Einfedern die typischen Roll- und Wankbewegungen der Karosserie. Ein mit einem ST Gewindefahrwerk ausgestattetes Fahrzeug agiert direkter auf alle Fahrmanöver und ist beim Fahren deutlich agiler. Beispielsweise taucht bei Bremsmanövern die Nase des Fahrzeugs weniger ein und die Handling-Eigenschaften steigern sich. Die hochwertige Verarbeitung der ST X Gewindefahrwerke beinhalteten neben einem reibungsarmen und druckbeständigen Gehäuse auch eine verchromte Kolbenstange. Für langen Fahrspaß sorgt auch das Monoblock-Führungs- und Dichtungspaket, das den Zweirohrdämpfer vor dem Eindringen von Schmutzpartikeln schützt.

Tieferlegen mit STil: die ST X Gewindefahrwerke
Durch ihre hochwertige Verarbeitung, der ausgewogenen Dämpferabstimmung und der leichten Verstellbarkeit der stufenlosen Tieferlegung sind die ST X Gewindefahrwerke made by KW das ideale Gewindefahrwerk für Tuningfreunde:

- Individuelle Tieferlegung innerhalb des geprüften Einstellbereichs
- VA und HA (sofern technisch möglich) mit Gewindeverstellung
- Verzinkte Gewindefederbeine mit zusätzlicher Versiegelung für einen optimierten Korrosionsschutz
- Komplette Lösung mit Verstellfederteller, Federsystem und Anschlagelementen mit Staubschutzsystem
- Leistungsfähiger 2-Rohr Dämpfer mit hochwertigen Komponenten für eine lange Lebensdauer


Bei Fahrzeugen mit elektronischer Dämpferregelung muss diese stillgelegt werden. Fahrzeugspezifische KW Stilllegungssätze finden Sie in der Zubehörtabelle.


Technische Informationen:

- Marke : ST

- Artikelnummer : 13230059
- Stahl verzinkt
- Individuelle, stufenlose Tieferlegung
- Lieferumfang Set VA + HA Gewindefederbeine
- Achslast VA/HA (kg): -1070 / -1040
- hochwertige Bauteile für lange Lebensdauer
- Zulassung : Teilegutachten (§19.3)


Hinweis: Die Abbildung kann vom gelieferten Produkt abweichen

FORD FOCUS III (DYB_) 07/2010-02/2020 2.0 ST Schrägheck Benzin 184 KW 1999 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
FORD FOCUS III (DYB_) 07/2010-02/2020 2.0 ST Schrägheck Benzin 188 KW 1999 ccm 4 Frontantrieb
FORD FOCUS III (DYB_) 07/2010-02/2020 2.0 TDCi ST Schrägheck Diesel 136 KW 1997 ccm 4 Frontantrieb

.




Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 40833705732

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
X
Verified Purchase
xiwaeo
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jeff Wade
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
F
Verified Purchase
Fig&Friday
New York, US
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
rbnn
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written. Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier. My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author. Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing. And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot... In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
W
Verified Purchase
WANDA LEE CATALAN
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026

recommand products

Fightshorts FUSION-R Tsunami - Lila
49.99
Trainingsjacke DMC - Team Austria
49.99
MMA Sparring Handschuhe Serious
59.99
Ringerschuhe NIKE Tawa - Rot/Schwarz
119.99
Kinder Fightshorts EVO Apex
29.99