SKU: 48822810586

Belutsch | 138 cm x 99 cm | Nr. Z-4182

Sale price$126.00 Regular price$140.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $35.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 20 - Aug 25

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Belutsch | 138 cm x 99 cm | Nr. Z-4182Geometrischer Belutsch, rostrot mit Bordre Herkunft Persien Mae 138 cm x 99 cm (= 1,3662 qm) Herstellung handgeknpft Material Flor: Wolle (handgesponnen, Naturfarben) Schuss & Kette: Wolle Knoten m2 160. 000 Florhhe 4mm Herstellungsjahr 1970 Farbe Rostrot, Schwarz Auflage Einzelstck Herkunft Belutsch ist eine Teppichprovenienz zwischen Afghanistan, Iran und Pakistan. Die Belutsch Teppiche (auch Belutsch, Beloutch, Beluch, Baluch, Belutch, Balouch,

Geometrischer Belutsch, rostrot mit Bordüre

Herkunft
Persien
Maße 138 cm x 99 cm (= 1,3662 qm)
Herstellung handgeknüpft
Material Flor: Wolle (handgesponnen, Naturfarben)
Schuss & Kette: Wolle
Knoten/m2 160.000
Florhöhe 4mm
Herstellungsjahr 1970
Farbe Rostrot, Schwarz
Auflage Einzelstück

Herkunft

Belutsch ist eine Teppichprovenienz zwischen Afghanistan, Iran und Pakistan. Die Belutsch Teppiche (auch Belutsch, Beloutch, Beluch, Baluch, Belutch, Balouch, Baloutche oder Balúchi) werden von Halbnomaden oder Nomaden hergestellt. Ursprünglich wurden Belutsch Teppiche ausschließlich von den Baluchen Nomaden geknüpft. Heute knüpfen jedoch auch einige andere Stämme Belutsch Teppiche. Die Muster sind tendenziell geometrisch angelegt und die Farbpalette in Rot und Braun Tönen gehalten. Überwiegend werden Brücken und kleinere Teppiche produziert, weil diese auch von den Nomaden selbst verwendet werden und leichter transportiert werden können.

Muster

Der Rand des Teppichs wird von einer Umrandung (Bordüre) geziert. Die Bordüre bildet einen schönen Kontrast zum Zentrum.

Die abstrakte, geometrische Komposition macht die schlichte Eleganz dieses Belutschs aus. Das Muster schmeichelt der Gestaltung des Raumes und nimmt den Möbeln, der Dekoration und den architektonischen Element nicht die Aufmerksamkeit. Es fügt sich fantastisch in jede Umgebung ein und ergänzt die Einrichtung eines Raumes auf subtile Weise.

Im Gesamteindruck dominiert die Farbe Rostrot und die Farbe Schwarz. Der Rand ist in den Farben Rostrot und Schwarz gestaltet.

Zustand

Ihr seid nicht die ersten, die Gefallen an diesem Belutsch finden. Er hatte bereits Besitzer vor Euch, die ihn geschätzt und benutzt haben. Er wurde ca. 1970 handgeknüpft. Wir haben ihn gründlich gereinigt und liebevoll restauriert. Er ist daher – trotz seines Alters – in einem sehr guten Zustand.

Material

Die Technik mit der die Materialen für den Flor dieses Belutschs hergestellt wurden ist über 200 Jahre alt. Die Wolle wurde mit Naturfarben gefärbt und von Hand versponnenen. Das Färben mit Natur- oder Pflanzenfarben ist komplizierter, teuerer und zeitaufwendiger als das Färben mit chemischen Farben. Für ein leuchtendes Rot beispielsweise braucht man pro Kilo Wolle rund ein Kilo gemahlene Krappwurzel als Farbstoff. Für ein kräftiges, nicht zu blasses Gelb benötigt man pro Kilo Wolle sogar zwei Kilogramm des Farbstoffes Färberwau. Auch das Spinnen der Wolle ist zeit- und arbeitsintensiv. Zudem beherschen immer weniger Menschen das Spinnen der Wolle mit der Hand.

Doch der Aufwand lohnt sich: Durch das Färben mit Naturfarben behält die hochwertige Wolle ihren natürlichen Fettgehalt. Die mit Naturfarben gefärbte und von Hand versponnene Wolle erzeugt faszinierende, changierende Muster. Der Charme handgesponnener Wolle mit ihren leichten Unregelmäßigkeiten und natürlichen Farbtönen entfaltet sich als Kontrast in modernen Interieurs aber auch in Räumen, die traditioneller oder im Landhausstil eingerichtet sind. Der Untergrund (Schuss- und Kettfäden) dieses Belutschs besteht aus Schurwolle.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 48822810586

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
X
Verified Purchase
xiwaeo
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
Great Read
Great book, I enjoyed reading it. I am non-lawyer so I spent time having to read and re-read sentences and paragraphs but darn good book. Highly recommend it. Sometimes a person can be in discussion with an official, doctor, lawyer, cop ..whatever--it helps to remember arguments made in this book. Most folks just try to explain a situation, heaven forbid standing in front of a court or judge in a legal matter. But, this type of reading builds confidence, a strong vocabulary and so forth. It matters most trying to persuade a person or an institution..just winning, making your point in a clear coherent and cognizant way. This book can teach you these things.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 20, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jeff Wade
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
F
Verified Purchase
Fig&Friday
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
R
Verified Purchase
rbnn
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written. Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier. My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author. Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing. And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot... In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
W
Verified Purchase
WANDA LEE CATALAN
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026

recommand products