Pay in installments of $3.75 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Safer Brand Organic Liquid Insect Killing Soap 32 ozThe Safer Brand Insect Killing Soap utilizes the power of potassium salts of fatty acids (insecticidal soap). The potassium salts weaken the insects waxy protective outer shell. Apply every 5 7 days when insects are present or as needed to prevent further damage. Safer Brand's Insecticidal Soap is ideal for aphid control and mealybug control, as it will dehydrate the insect by breaking down its waxy membrane. This OMRI listed and compliant for use in
The Safer Brand Insect Killing Soap utilizes the power of potassium salts of fatty acids (insecticidal soap). The potassium salts weaken the insect’s waxy protective outer shell. Apply every 5-7 days when insects are present or as needed to prevent further damage. Safer Brand's Insecticidal Soap is ideal for aphid control and mealybug control, as it will dehydrate the insect by breaking down its waxy membrane. This OMRI-listed and compliant for use in organic gardening pest control formula kills a variety of insect pests but is gentle on plants. Since Safer Brand Insect Killing Soap is a contact killer, several applications may be needed for full control. As a general rule, much like watering, do not use these products in the peak of the day or when temperatures exceed 90 degrees F to avoid wilting or browning of the leaves. Safer Brand Insect Killing Soap leaves no unpleasant odor and will not persist in the environment.
- Targets and kills aphids, earwigs, grasshoppers, harlequin bugs, leafhoppers, mealy bugs, mites, plant bugs, psyllids, sawfly larvae, soft scales, spider mites, squash bugs, blossom thrips and whiteflies
- Gentle on plants with no unpleasant odor
- Can be used up until the day of harvest
- Contains potassium salts of fatty acids (2%) and seaweed extract
Features
| Assembly Code | N |
| Country Of Origin | US |
| Delivery Offered | Y |
| Department Number | 7 |
| Display Only Item | N |
| Dollar Velocity Code | A |
| Feature 10 Text | |
| Feature 1 Text | Targets and kills aphids, earwigs, grasshoppers, h |
| Feature 2 Text | Gentle on plants with no unpleasant odor |
| Feature 3 Text | Can be used up until the day of harvest |
| Feature 4 Text | Contains potassium salts of fatty acids (2%) and s |
| Feature 5 Text | |
| Feature 6 Text | |
| Feature 7 Text | |
| Feature 8 Text | |
| Feature 9 Text | |
| Item Restriction Flag | N |
| Product Source Code | B |
| Product Type | Insect Killing Soap |
| Product Type Code | 009010701007 |
| Sub-category | Insecticides |
| Proposition 65 Flag | N |
| Retail Velocity Code | B |
| Shipping Code | Y |
| Store Availability Rank | 01 |
| Unit Velocity Code | A |
| Vendor Name | WOODSTREAM CORP |
| Vendor Number | 17396 |
| Web Order Multiple | 1 |
| Proposition 65 Warning | |
| ISPU Only Item Flag | N |
| Category | Insect and Animal Control |
| Merchandise Class Description | INSECTICIDES/REPELLENTS |
| Product Group Description | RTU PRODUCTS/APPLICATORS |
| Product Type Noun | Soap |
| Search Field | Safer Brand Organic Liquid Insect Killing Soap 32 |
| Sales Rank | 008 |
| What's Included | |
| DIFM Service Code | N |
| Warranty Code | N |
| Old Default Base SKU | |
| Paint Code | N |
| Default Base SKU | |
| Accessory SKUs | |
| Replacement Part SKUs | |
| Brand Name | Safer Brand |
| Local SKU Available Stores | ALL |
| Local SKU Store SKUs | 74805 |
| Reviews | 2 |
| Customer Rating | 5 |
| Active Ingredient | potassium-salts-of-fatty-acids |
| Container Size | 32-ounce |
| Organic | yes |
| Packaging Type | trigger-spray-bottle |
| Pest Type | crawling/flying-insects |
| Product Form | liquid |
| Ready to Use | yes |
| Safe for Edibles | yes |
| Safe for Pets | no |
| Indoor or Outdoor | outdoor |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 12 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public.
1. Ignores public opinion.
The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision.
2. Starts with a strange premise.
The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit?
3. Offers dubious legal advice.
In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize.
4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes.
The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion.
If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same.
The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to.
"Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
recommand products
Fuel Injection Pump 22100-0E020 for Toyota Hilux HP5 1GD-FTV 2.8 L 2DG-FTV 2.4L
334.50
CS33K6E-TFD-970 Compressor
7238429.50
Control Box Update System Kit 105295GT 105295 for Genie Gen 5 GS-1530 GS-1930 GS-2032
174.47
ZR49KCETFD260 Compressor
4999999.50
Joystick Controller 137634 for Genie Lift GS-1530 GS-1532 GS-1932 GS-2032 GS-2046
151.95