SKU: 60348744880

Rekon FPV Rekon4 FR 4" Analog Freestyle Quadcopter w/ Caddx Ratel V2 - 4S

Sale price$137.70 Regular price$153.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Rekon FPV Rekon4 FR 4" Analog Freestyle Quadcopter w/ Caddx Ratel V2 - 4SThe Rekon4 FR Analog is a 4" BNF Quad with a robust frame, quick swap arms, and a Sub250 weight goal. This quad was designed to create a sub 250g freestyle platform that gets as close as possible to a classic five inch quad. And while performance was the main objective, Rekon FPV still wanted it to be practical for everyday use. The motor and propeller configuration was crucial to achieving the desired flight characteristics. After weeks of testing,

The Rekon4 FR Analog is a 4" BNF Quad with a robust frame, quick-swap arms, and a Sub250 weight goal. This quad was designed to create a sub 250g freestyle platform that gets as close as possible to a “classic” five-inch quad. And while performance was the main objective, Rekon FPV still wanted it to be practical for everyday use.

The motor and propeller configuration was crucial to achieving the desired flight characteristics. After weeks of testing, Rekon FPV finally settled for an intermediate stator size with an aggressive kV. A stator larger than 1804 (e.g. 1606, 2004, 2204) didn’t seem to offer any noticeable improvement of flight characteristics while adding a significant amount of weight. Anything smaller than 1804 just did not have enough torque to make the quad feel locked and snappy enough. 

The best performing props were the Gemfan 4023 tribades. They are more on the aggressive side in comparison to the HQ T4x2x3 and while they can be pretty amp hungry on the relatively high kV 1804 motors, they ensure the quad has an impressive punch! 

Check out all our Analog Pre Built Quads, our Rekon4 Collection and the rest of our RekonFPV Products!

 

VIDEO: Rekon 4 FR - My take on Sub250 Freestyle

Features

  • A robust frame with quick swap arms that can take hard crashes and offers good component protection.

  • Margin towards the sub 250g goal, so you do not have to worry about every gram
  • Compatibility with a widely available battery sized (650-850mah 4S)
  • Option to carry light HD cameras (Naked GoPro, SMO, Insta 360)

 

 

Specifications

  • Motors: Rekon 1804 3500KV
  • Model: Rekon4 4inch Frame
  • Propellers: Gemfan 4023
  • Motor Input voltage:3-4S
  • Wheelbase:180 mm
  • Size:180x140 mm
  • Weight: 143.2g

Zeus25 AIO 3-6S FC

  • FC firmware:BF ZEUSF722_AIO (HGLR)
  • Input voltage:3-6S
  • Size:32.5x32.5mm

Zeus Nano 350mW VTX

  • Output power:PIT/25/100/200/350mW
  • Input voltage:DC 5V
  • Interface:IPEX

CADDX Ratel 2 Camera

  • Image sensor:1/1.8 inch 1200TVL CMOS
  • Input voltage:DC 5-40V
  • Size:19x19x20mm

Recommended ( Not Included)

  • Battery: 4S: 550mah

Includes

  • 1x Rekon FPV Rekon4 FR 4" Analog Freestyle Quadcopter w/ Caddx Ratel V2 - 4S (Receiver Optional)
  • 2x Gemfan 4023 4-inch 3-blades propeller (Set of 4)
  • 1x Hammer antenna (RHCP)

 

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 60348744880

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1842 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
Tink
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 1
Never got to try it because it was broken
Color: Black
Came with a broken piece and is taking forever to get a refund…there wasn’t an option for a replacement
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2026
E
Verified Purchase
Estefani T
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 3
Room divider
Color: Black, Color: Black
It was much simpler than anticipated. I don't think it's very sturdy and it lacks weight, but it's attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
April Zheng
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Color: Black
This is very sturdy and great quality. Its quite cheap for what your getting to it’s not cheap thin like plastic it feels thick and you could put a LITTLE weight on it it’s stable and protects your privacy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
A
Amazon Customer
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well. Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely. One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs. The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers. Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster. Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality. Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
F
Fred
Carnegie, US
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one. The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy. Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex. The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one. The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026

recommand products