SKU: 71240290659

B&M Hi-Tek Deep Trans Pan for Ford 6R80/6R100 Transmissions - 70394

Sale price$263.23 Regular price$292.48
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $73.12 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

B&M Hi-Tek Deep Trans Pan for Ford 6R80/6R100 Transmissions - 70394Overview: Our Hi Tek deep transmission pans are constructed from A356 T6 aluminum and are cast with thick internal and external fins, adding additional strength and increased cooling properties. The deep pan design increases fluid capacity by 3. 25 quarts over the stock O. E. pan. All these features combined help dissipate heat quicker netting lower transmission and fluid temperatures prolonging the life of your transmission, transmission fluid and

Overview:

Our Hi-Tek deep transmission pans are constructed from A356-T6 aluminum and are cast with thick internal and external fins, adding additional strength and increased cooling properties. The deep pan design increases fluid capacity by 3.25-quarts over the stock O.E. pan. All these features combined help dissipate heat quicker netting lower transmission and fluid temperatures prolonging the life of your transmission, transmission fluid and corresponding components. Other features for this popular pan include a drain port with magnetic drain plug for clean and easy servicing. Also includes 1/8-inch npt temperature sensor port for easily adding a temp gauge for monitoring transmission temperatures while daily driving, towing or racing. Includes detailed instructions with all necessary hardware for an easy at home installation. Note: 6R80 transmissions do not come with a dip stick from the factory to check fluid level. As a solution, B&M offers an optional 6R80 locking dipstick part #22200 to measure transmission fluid level. Note: Does Not Fit Mustangs.

Features:

  • Drain Port with Magnetic Drain Plug for Easy Servicing
  • Durable A356 Aluminum Construction
  • Features a Temperature Sensor Port
  • Additional 3.25-quart Fluid Capacity
  • MIL-Spec Black Anodized Finish
  • Lifetime Limited Warranty
  • B&M Quality

Application:

Year Make Model Submodel Engine Size
2015 - 2017 Ford Mustang GT Premium
2015 - 2017 Ford Mustang EcoBoost Premium
2009 - 2017 Ford Expedition
2015 - 2017 Ford Transit-150
2015 - 2017 Ford Transit-250
2015 - 2017 Ford Transit-350
2015 - 2017 Ford Transit-350 HD
2009 - 2018 Ford F-150 XL
2009 - 2018 Ford F-150 XLT
2011 - 2014 Ford Mustang Base
2011 - 2017 Ford Mustang GT
2011 - 2016 Ford F-150
2015 - 2017 Ford Mustang V6
2015 - 2017 Ford Mustang EcoBoost
2015 Ford Mustang GT 50 Years Limited Edition
2009 - 2017 Ford F-150 Platinum
2009 - 2017 Ford F-150 King Ranch
2009 - 2017 Ford F-150 Lariat
2017 Ford F-150 SSV
2010 Ford F-150 Harley-Davidson Edition
2009 - 2010 Ford F-150 FX4
2010 Ford F-150 FX2
2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor
2009 - 2010 Ford F-150 STX

Specs:

Additional Fluid Capacity (qts) 3.25
Bolt Count 21
Bolt/Studs Included Yes
Brand B&M
California Proposition 65 Chemical Name Chromium (hexavalent compounds)
California Proposition 65 Required Yes
Color/Finish Black Anodized
Drain Plug Included Yes
Drain Plug Type Magnetic
Emission Code 5
Filler Plug Included No
Fits Trans Models 6R80
Gasket Included No
Material A356.0-T6 Alumininum
Product Type Automatic Transmission Oil Pan
Temp Sensor Port Yes
Transmission Type Ford 6R80, 6R100
Warning California Proposition 65
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 71240290659

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.1 ★★★★★
Based on 15 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
J
Verified Purchase
Judith Priddy
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
A
Verified Purchase
Adam C. Driver
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
james p. whitters III
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
B
Big Pumpkin
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public. 1. Ignores public opinion. The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision. 2. Starts with a strange premise. The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit? 3. Offers dubious legal advice. In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize. 4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes. The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion. If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
J
Jason Galbraith
Omaha, US
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same. The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to. "Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025

recommand products