SKU: 74717576086

Canon EOS R50 Body with RF 18-45mm Black

Sale price$256.50 Regular price$285.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $71.25 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 19 - Aug 24

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Canon EOS R50 Body with RF 18-45mm BlackThe Canon EOS R50 Body with RF 18 45mm lens black is a powerful camera that delivers exceptional image quality. With its stunning clarity and precision, every detail is captured with lifelike precision. Whether you're capturing breathtaking landscapes or shooting beautiful portraits, this camera ensures that your photos will be vivid and truly showcase the beauty of the subject. Take your photography to the next level with the Canon EOS R50 Body.

The Canon EOS R50 Body with RF 18-45mm lens black is a powerful camera that delivers exceptional image quality. With its stunning clarity and precision, every detail is captured with lifelike precision. Whether you're capturing breathtaking landscapes or shooting beautiful portraits, this camera ensures that your photos will be vivid and truly showcase the beauty of the subject. Take your photography to the next level with the Canon EOS R50 Body.

Versatile Shooting Options

With its wide range of shooting modes and creative features, the Mirrorless Camera Canon EOS R50 Body allows you to unleash your creativity and capture images exactly as you envision them. From manual mode for complete control to automatic scene recognition, this camera offers versatility for all types of photographers. This camera offers versatile options, from manual mode for complete control to automatic scene recognition, catering to all types of photographers.

Superior Autofocus Performance

The Canon EOS R50 Body with Canon RF-S 18-45mm F/4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Black offers superior autofocus performance, making it the perfect camera for capturing fast-moving objects and stunning portraits. With its advanced autofocus system and intelligent Eye Autofocus technology, this camera ensures sharp focus and can even detect and focus on a subject's eyes. Whether you're capturing action shots or taking portraits, the Canon EOS R50 Body delivers exceptional autofocus performance for professional-quality results.

Intuitive Touchscreen Interface

Navigate through menus and adjust settings with ease using the bright and responsive touchscreen interface of the Canon Mirrorless Camera EOS R50 Body. The intuitive design allows for effortless operation, letting you concentrate on capturing the perfect shot without any distractions.

Wi-Fi Connectivity

Share your photos instantly with friends and family using the built-in Wi-Fi connectivity of the Canon EOS R50 Body. Transfer images wirelessly to your smartphone or tablet for easy sharing on social media platforms or printing at home.

Durable and Lightweight Design

The Canon EOS R50 Body with RF 18-45mm Black Canon Camera lens is designed with both durability and lightweight in mind. This camera body is perfect for photographers who are constantly on the move, as its compact size allows for easy transport without sacrificing performance or image quality. Capture stunning photos and videos without the burden of carrying heavy equipment, thanks to the durable yet lightweight design of the Canon EOS R50 Body.

In conclusion,

The Canon EOS R50 Body with RF 18-45mm Black is a versatile and high-performing camera that delivers exceptional image quality. With its advanced autofocus system, intuitive touchscreen interface, and Wi-Fi connectivity, it provides photographers with endless possibilities to capture their vision. Whether you're a professional or an enthusiast, this camera is sure to exceed your expectations.

Canon EOS R50 Mirrorless Camera (Black) Specs

Imaging
Lens Mount Canon RF
Sensor Resolution Effective: 24.2 Megapixel
Image Sensor 22.3 x 14.9 mm (APS-C) CMOS
Crop Factor 1.6x
Image Stabilization None
Built-In ND Filter None
Capture Type Stills & Video
Exposure Control
Shutter Type Electronic Shutter
Shutter Speed Electronic Shutter
1/8000 Up to 30 Seconds
Electronic Front Curtain Shutter
1/4000 Up to 30 Seconds
Bulb/Time Mode Bulb Mode, Time Mode
ISO Sensitivity Photo/Video
100 to 32,000 (Extended: 51,200)
Metering Method Center-Weighted Average, Evaluative, Partial, Spot
Exposure Modes Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority
Exposure Compensation -3 to +3 EV (1/3 EV Steps)
Metering Range -2 to 20 EV
White Balance Presets: Auto, Cloudy, Color Temperature, Custom, Daylight, Flash, Fluorescent (White), Shade, Tungsten
Continuous Shooting Electronic Shutter
Up to 15 fps for up to 28 Frames (JPEG) / 7 Frames (Raw)
Electronic Shutter
Up to 12 fps for up to 42 Frames (JPEG) / 7 Frames (Raw)
Interval Recording Yes
Self-Timer 2/10-Second Delay
Still Image Capture
Aspect Ratio 3:2
Image File Format C-RAW, HEIF, JPEG, Raw
Video Capture
Internal Recording Modes H.264/H.265/MPEG-4
UHD 4K (3840 x 2160) at 23.98/25/29.97 fps
1920 x 1080 at 23.98/25/29.97/50/59.94/100/120 fps
Broadcast Output NTSC/PAL
Built-In Microphone Type Stereo
Interface
Media/Memory Card Slot Single Slot: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Video I/O 1 x Micro-HDMI Output
Audio I/O 1 x 1/8" / 3.5 mm TRS Stereo Microphone Input on Camera Body
Other I/O 1 x USB-C Input/Output
Wireless 2.4 / 5 GHz Bluetooth 4.2 Control
Wi-Fi
Mobile App Compatible Yes
*As of February 2023: Check with the manufacturer for the most up-to-date compatibility
Global Positioning (GPS, GLONASS, etc.) None
Monitor
Size 3"
Resolution 1,062,000 Dot
Display Type Articulating Touchscreen LCD
Viewfinder
Type Built-In Electronic (OLED)
Size 0.39"
Resolution 2,360,000 Dot
Eye Point 22 mm
Coverage 100%
Magnification Approx. 96x
Diopter Adjustment -3 to +1
Focus
Focus Type Auto and Manual Focus
Focus Mode Continuous-Servo AF, Manual Focus, Single-Servo AF
Autofocus Points Photo
Phase Detection: 4503
Video
Phase Detection: 3713
Autofocus Sensitivity -4 to +20 EV
Flash
Built-In Flash Yes
Maximum Sync Speed 1/250 Second
Flash Compensation -3 to +3 EV (1/3 EV Steps)
Dedicated Flash System eTTL
External Flash Connection Intelligent Hot Shoe
Environmental
Operating Temperature 32 to 104°F / 0 to 40°C
Operating Humidity 0 to 85% (Recommended)
General
Battery Type 1 x LP-E17 Rechargeable Lithium Polymer, 7.2 VDC, 1040 mAh
Tripod Mounting Thread 1 x 1/4"-20 Female (Bottom)
Dimensions (W x H x D) 4.6 x 3.4 x 2.7" / 116.3 x 85.5 x 68.8 mm
Weight 13.2 oz / 375 g (With Battery, Recording Media)
11.6 oz / 328 g (Body Only)

Canon RF-S 18-45mm F/4.5-6.3 IS STM Lens Specs

Focal Length 18 to 45mm (35mm Equivalent Focal Length: 29 to 72mm)
Maximum Aperture f/4.5 to 6.3
Minimum Aperture f/32
Lens Mount Canon RF
Lens Format Coverage APS-C
Angle of View 74° 20' to 33° 40'
Minimum Focus Distance 7.9" / 20 cm
Maximum Magnification 0.16x
Optical Design 7 Elements in 7 Groups
Diaphragm Blades 7, Rounded
Focus Type Autofocus
Image Stabilization Yes
Filter Size 49 mm (Front)
Dimensions (ø x L) 2.7 x 1.7" / 68.9 x 44.3 mm
Weight 4.6 oz / 130 g


    Shipping Notes
    • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
    • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
    • Delivery to the USA:
    1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
    • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
    Exchange/Return Notes
    • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
    • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
    • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
    • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
    SKU: 74717576086

    Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

    Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

    4.3 ★★★★★
    Based on 14 reviews
    Sort
    Highest Rating
    Newest First
    Oldest First
    Product Reviews
    S
    Verified Purchase
    S.B.
    Draper, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Great, easy to understand explanations
    Format: Kindle
    I definitely needed this! I have been enduring a long period of spiritual attacks in the natural and physical realms. It has helped me to better understand my calling, even though I have been serving God as a spirit filled and spirit baptized follower of Yeshua.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2025
    T
    Verified Purchase
    Trader Dave
    Belleville, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Easy to read. Line spacing is just right! Thank you!
    Format: Paperback
    Michael Van Vlymen delivers the lived from experience truth once again! Michael is down to earth and matter of fact as he writes. He is heavenly minded every day! I've grown more in love with Jesus because of his testimony of heavenly realms operating on the earthly realm. My eyes have been opened much much more as I listen and read Mikes well illustrated books and videos!
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on February 24, 2025
    O
    Verified Purchase
    Online shopper
    Draper, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Challenge Accepted
    Format: Kindle
    I liked the book. It challenged my position of focusing on the light and ignoring the darkness. It challenges me to desire the whole experience of spiritual awareness and sight and to become adept in living as a watchman.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2025
    T
    Verified Purchase
    Tim Chaffey
    Lowell, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Outstanding, compelling, and thorough work on the historicity or non-historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus
    Format: Paperback
    I had been looking forward to reading this book since the first time I heard about it. I was sitting in Dr. Gary Habermas' class on miracles and he told us about Mike Licona, who was currently working on his dissertation on the Resurrection. Although it was published in 2010, I finally had the opportunity to read it over the past few months. At over 700 pages, including an extensive bibliography and over 2,000 footnotes, this book is not a light read by any stretch of the imagination. As the subtitle states, this is a book dealing with historiography. Readers looking for a deep theological treatment on the Resurrection of Christ may want to look elsewhere since Licona's focus here is not theology, but history (although there is still a good deal of theology). Using methodological principles agreed upon by a vast number of historians from a variety of religious and philosophical backgrounds, he sets out to determine whether or not the historian "is warranted in regarding Jesus' resurrection as an event that occurred in the past" (p. 610). Surprisingly, the book consists of only five chapters and one appendix, so each chapter averages more than 100 pages in length. Also, the second half of the book contains a significant amount of Greek, giving me a good opportunity to brush up on that. If you can't read Greek, don't worry, Dr. Licona provides an English translation throughout. The first section deals with a significant number of preliminary considerations. There is an excellent critique of the skeptical postmodern view of history and a complete dismantling of the beliefs of Jesus "mythers" (those who claim Jesus never existed). There's also a good discussion on horizons (the presuppositions and biases we all have). While total neutrality may not be possible, Licona gives several principles historians should implement to help them transcend their horizon. Finally, he provides an honest discussion of his own biases so that readers are well aware of where he is coming from. The second chapter focuses on whether or not miracles fall within the purview of the historian. Licona addresses the popular objections of David Hume and Bart Ehrman, as well as McCullagh, Meier, Wedderburn, and Dunn. Many skeptics simply have an a priori objection to miracles, so they aren't willing to even consider the possibility that historical evidence for a miracle may exist. There's an interesting discussion on the burden of proof as it relates to the historicity of miracle claims. I thought the following quote summarized the nature of evidence when it comes to miracle claims: "It is the responsibility of the historian to consider what the evidence would look like if she were not wearing her metaphysical bias like a pair of sunglasses that shade the world. It is not the responsibility of the evidence to shine so brightly that they render such glasses ineffectual." (p. 196) With all the preliminary matters out of the way, Dr. Licona gets down to the business of doing history. Chapter three examines the historical sources pertaining to Christ's Resurrection. Many Christians may object to the methodology employed in this chapter since he does not automatically accept every biblical passage on the subject as evidence, but bear in mind that Licona is doing his best to transcend his own Christian horizon to be as neutral as possible. He discusses over two dozen early sources and rates them as "unlikely, possible-minus, possible, possible-plus, highly probable, indeterminate [or] not useful" (p. 201). The fourth chapter uncovers the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. This approach follows on the heels of the exhaustive work of Dr. Habermas who, since 1975, has kept track of over 3,400 academic works from scholars of various stripes on the Resurrection in English, German, and French. From this research, Dr. Habermas has shown that there are 12 facts accepted by the vast majority of scholars. He has reduced this to six best attested details in what he calls the "minimal facts" approach. Each of these facts are discussed, but Dr. Licona narrows this down to three facts that nearly all scholars agree upon: 1) Jesus died by crucifixion, 2) the disciples had experiences that led them to believe and proclaim that Jesus had risen from the dead, and 3) Paul converted to Christianity after experiencing what he believed to be a post-Resurrection appearance of Jesus. There's also a lengthy discussion on what "resurrection" meant to Jewish and Christian audiences in the first century. The information contained in this chapter is often completely ignored by agnostics, atheists, Muslims, and others who do not want to even consider the Resurrection as a possibility. I have had many discussions with skeptics who display naivete when they claim that there is no evidence to support the claim that Jesus rose from the dead. It's one thing to disbelieve in the event, but it's an entirely different thing to completely ignore or to willingly remain ignorant of the historical bedrock pertaining to the fate of Jesus. The fifth and final chapter of the book examines six different hypotheses that attempt to explain what happened to Jesus after being crucified. Along with the traditional Christian understanding of the Resurrection, the views promoted by Vermes, Goulder, Ludemann, Crossen, and Craffert are weighed in terms of their explanatory scope, explanatory power, plausibility, the amount of ad hoc elements, and illumination for solving problems associated with the subject. An appendix also examines Dale Allison's work on the Resurrection according to the same criteria. The traditional Resurrection hypothesis is the only view that fulfills all five criteria, and it outdistances the other views by a wide margin. Critics can claim that Licona merely concluded what he hoped to prove, but they must be able to point out flaws in his methodology, since his conclusion most certainly follows from the data when historiographical principles are applied. My biggest concern with the book is found in the fifth chapter. While discussing the strange events described in Matthew 27:51-53, Licona suggested that the passage was not describing historical events but employing apocalyptic language to show that a significant person had died. Such descriptions were not uncommon in the ancient world when describing the death of important people. This comment has set off a wave of criticism from conservative Christian scholars like Norman Geisler and Al Mohler. I disagree with Licona's statement and share some of the same concerns as Geisler and Mohler. But when I consider the context and methodology being used in the book, I don't find it to be quite as grievous an error as some have claimed. Skeptics will undoubtedly continue to dismiss the Resurrection of Christ, but they must deal with the research in this book or they simply are not interacting with the latest scholarship. Dr. Licona's work raises the bar when it comes to the most important subject we could ever study: the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. I highly recommend it for anyone interested in this subject who is up to the task of reading an academic work. I have studied the subject for years, but I still learned a lot and will treasure this book as an extremely valuable resource. Even though I disagree with his take on Matt. 27:51-53, I still need to give the book five stars since I don't need to agree with the author on every point for me to give a positive review and recognize the book's worth.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on December 30, 2012
    B
    Verified Purchase
    Brant Jones
    Lake Worth, US
    ★★★★★ 5
    Brilliant, rigorous, balanced, and approachable
    Format: Paperback
    "The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach," by Michael R. Licona is an outstanding, thorough yet highly approachable assessment of the evidence, sources, and explanatory hypotheses for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As the subtitle suggests, it borrows significant methodological rigor and best practices from the field of historical analysis and applies them to biblical scholarship. Licona begins his assessment with a meticulous discussion of his historical analysis methodology. Included in this section is his definition of five criteria he uses to assess a set of explanatory hypotheses. He then uses those assessments to weigh the hypotheses based on nine levels of certainty ranging from “certainly not historical” to “certainly historical.” The hypothesis representing the best explanation for the resurrection of Christ is the one rated highest in historical certainty based on the five criteria. At the outset of the book, Licona also includes a robust discussion of historical analysis influences and issues because evaluating them openly is essential to his methodical approach and because they aren’t often discussed in biblical studies. It is in this section that he does something quite unique and insightful; Licona includes a full discussion of knowledge, experiences, worldviews, preferences and other influences, which he calls “horizons,” that tend to bias the assessment of history. Furthermore, he defines a set of six methods that he uses throughout the book to avoid his own biases as he strives to present outcomes based on methodical neutrality. It’s quite brilliant. Licona even includes a confession of his own “horizons” - his potential influences. With all this foundation in place, Licona proceeds to identify all sources of evidence for the resurrection of Christ and rates each according to its likelihood of providing reliable independent testimony. Included in this assessment are sources from the Bible, early Christian writers, non-biblical Christian literature and early non-Christian writers. He then uses the most reliable sources as the basis for attesting to the reliability for all the available evidence for the resurrection. This produces three pieces of evidence that he calls “historical bedrock” because they are well attested within multiple reliable sources and are validated by a broad range of scholars. In the final section of the book, Licona evaluates major assertions against the resurrection from skeptics and compares the results against a parallel evaluation of the resurrection hypothesis. Specifically, he uses his criteria and rating system to assess how well hypotheses from a range of skeptical scholars, like Gerd Ludemann and John Dominic Crossan, are able to explain the historical bedrock evidence. At the end of this extensive analysis, the biblical resurrection hypothesis is by far the most credible explanation for historical bedrock evidence associated with the resurrection of Jesus Christ. As noted above, Michael Licona’s book is an excellent assessment of the evidence, sources and competing hypotheses associated with the resurrection of Christ. The author uniquely applies the meticulousness of best practice historical analysis methodology to arguably the most important of all biblical questions. Using rigorous criteria and rating scales, Licona delivers a fair and balanced evaluation that achieves the methodical neutrality he was striving for while minimizing, as best as possible, influences from his “horizons.” It’s also worth noting that Licona assesses a broad range of possible sources, including those classified as gnostic and pseudepigraphal, and includes viewpoints from a broad range of scholars, supportive and skeptical alike. Furthermore, the author includes a very robust set of footnotes on the various topics discussed within the book. These footnotes are helpful for both scholars and non-scholars looking for a deeper understanding or pointers for additional exploration plus they include additional explanatory comments that complement Licona’s focus on delivering a fair and balanced assessment. The one issue I found while reading the book was its treatment of the empty tomb evidence. I was disappointed the author’s discussion was brief since I was looking forward to a robust evaluation. However, in his defense, Licona was looking for historical bedrock evidence that could be used to assess the various resurrection hypotheses. A large number of scholars are skeptical of the empty tomb so it doesn’t belong in his historical bedrock category. Beside this one brief moment of disappointment, I was greatly pleased with the totality of Licona’s analysis and outcomes.
    WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
    Reviewed in the United States on April 25, 2021

    recommand products