Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 15 - Jul 20
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
ボア生地・ベージュ ボア生地1=10cm50cm(5) :550cm 101m 3 Textile designed by COLORFUL CANDY STYLE cm 122 100% 50% 50% 1=10cm 50cm10cm :550cm 101m () 2m 1m2=2m () PC + 0. 5cm1cm
数量：1=10cm単位での価格です。最低50cmから(数量：5)の販売となります。
※入力例:数量5→50cm/数量10→1m
※入力例:数量5→50cm/数量10→1m
ご注文・ご入金確認後、3営業日以内に発送予定です。（土・日・祝を除く）
こちらの商品は、生地以外の他商品と同時購入された場合、別送となります。
こちらの生地は商用利用可能です。購入された生地を用いた作品/商品を販売される際には、商品説明に必ず「Textile designed by COLORFUL CANDY STYLE」と明記して頂きますようお願いいたします。
※生地耳に商用利用不可と記載されている場合がございますが、商用利用可能です。
※生地耳に商用利用不可と記載されている場合がございますが、商用利用可能です。
ナチュラルな色合いでどんなものとも相性のいい定番カラー。おだやかで柔らかい印象をもたらす、上品なベージュです。
■生地に関する注意
熱に弱い素材のため、アイロンはお控えください。洗濯はドライクリーニングにて行なってください。
■生地に関する注意
熱に弱い素材のため、アイロンはお控えください。洗濯はドライクリーニングにて行なってください。
高級感を感じる、柔らかな手ざわりが魅力のボア素材。厚手のモコモコとした肌ざわりが愛らしく、ぬいぐるみ・マスコット作りや、スヌードなどのファッション小物にもおすすめです。
サイズ（単位：cm）
生地巾：約122
生地品質：パイル部：アクリル100% グランド部：アクリル50% ポリエステル50%
ご購入について
数量：1=10cm単位での価格です。
販売は最低50cmから、10cm単位でカットいたします。
※入力例:数量5→50cm/数量10→1m
中切れについて
在庫状況によってはごくまれにですが中切れしている(途中で切れている)商品がございますのでご了承くださいます様お願い申し上げます。
〔ご注文内容〕 2m → 〔納品形態〕 1m×2枚=2m
※中切れ(途中で切れている状態)でのご納品になる場合は出荷前に弊社よりお客様にご連絡させていただきます。
●生地色について
生地および商品の画像は、できるだけ商品に近い色で掲載しております。同じ色名でも生地や商品によって明るさや鮮やかさなど色味が異なります。
※お客様のモニター設定やPCの機種、室内環境等により、色味に違いが発生してしまう場合もございます。
●お取扱いにおけるご注意
洗濯により若干の色落ちや、多少の縮みが発生する場合があります。
商品によっては+-0.5cm～1cmの誤差が発生してしまう場合がございます。
また、お揃い生地商品が完売の際はご了承ください。
数量：1=10cm単位での価格です。
販売は最低50cmから、10cm単位でカットいたします。
※入力例:数量5→50cm/数量10→1m
中切れについて
在庫状況によってはごくまれにですが中切れしている(途中で切れている)商品がございますのでご了承くださいます様お願い申し上げます。
〔ご注文内容〕 2m → 〔納品形態〕 1m×2枚=2m
※中切れ(途中で切れている状態)でのご納品になる場合は出荷前に弊社よりお客様にご連絡させていただきます。
●生地色について
生地および商品の画像は、できるだけ商品に近い色で掲載しております。同じ色名でも生地や商品によって明るさや鮮やかさなど色味が異なります。
※お客様のモニター設定やPCの機種、室内環境等により、色味に違いが発生してしまう場合もございます。
●お取扱いにおけるご注意
洗濯により若干の色落ちや、多少の縮みが発生する場合があります。
商品によっては+-0.5cm～1cmの誤差が発生してしまう場合がございます。
また、お揃い生地商品が完売の際はご了承ください。
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 412 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 4
You don't have to like Justice Scalia to like his book.
Perhaps an appellate brief that you wrote would have been perfect if only the judge had read it. The lesson you learned, hopefully, was that there is no guarantee that a judge will read your brief. The lesson you can learn from "Making Your Case" is how to write so that the judges will read what you wrote - preferably before your oral argument. Writing in a quite candid, lucid and entertaining style, Scalia and Garner serve up tips that even the most experienced lawyers can learn from. If you find yourself approaching the court's word limit, for example, you may be minimizing the chances of having your brief read, as judges really do favor brevity. How do you write for a court that is notoriously dismissive of higher court precedents? How do you best respond to a judge who asks whether you would be content with a remand? These and other critical questions are addressed simply yet insightfully. If your legal education stressed the IRAC approach (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion), Scalia and Garner take you a step further by stressing a syllogistic approach. Even if you have already been exposed to all the best ideas about persuading appellate judges, you are still likely to gain much rom reading "Making Your Case" because the authors organize all those ideas in a way that makes them much easier to remember and keep them in mind as you prepare your written and oral arguments. Justice Scalia calls his approach to legal reasoning and argument "textualism," which I understand to mean that his decisions are driven by the language of the law and of the case. My impression from reading many of his decisions is that he is often driven by ideology, so I can't quite square his book with his decisions. I also question the book's fundamental statement that the overriding objective of a brief is to make the court's job easier, as I prefer to write primarily for the purpose of winning the case. My criticisms of "Making Your Case" are miniscule compared to those thrown at it by Richard Posner. But although I find Judge Posner's decisions generally more fair than those of Justice Scalia, I prefer the clarity of Justice Scalia's writing - especially when he teams up with Bryan Garmer. Judge Posner notwithstanding, Scalia and Garner have put together a gem that is likely to prove invaluable for law students as well as for trial and appellate lawyers who are still interested in improving their game. If you fall into either category, buy this book, read it two or three times, and then keep it handy as a reference. It should help you make your case.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 18, 2012
★★★★★ 5
A Great Read... (for those in the legal field)
A great gift for those in the legal field. We ordered several for gifts throughout the year.. Made a great little gift basket with a bottle of whiskey :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Elegant, useful
Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written.
Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier.
My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author.
Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing.
And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot...
In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2008
★★★★★ 5
Recomendado para todo estudiante de Derecho
Libro fácil de leer y fácil de comprender. Recomendado
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Wonderful and useful book.
Format: Kindle
I am very glad I purchased this book. I used it over and over again. Wrote many notes and it added much value to pursue my cases at courts. This is a true asset for providing an overall overview with much advice.
I also purchased his other book The Winning Brief, but that is only available in paper format and it is mainly for linguistic help in writing briefs for appellate court, for the purpose of really perfecting your writing. At lower courts or supreme courts you just do not have the time to think in that much details and these courts may not even read it. You are lucky if you can say two sentences on court appearances. They do not put that much into details when making judgments, so most likely your case ends up in the appellate, and here that book becomes valuable too - The Winning Brief.
Again, this book really excellent and pleasant to read. The Kindle version was easy to search for anything, word, phrase, notes.
5 star book. THANKS.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2018