SKU: 98952852536

1984-1987 Corvette Extreme+ Brake System Rear 4302124HO

Sale price$1934.97 Regular price$2149.97
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $537.49 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1984-1987 Corvette Extreme+ Brake System Rear 4302124HOFits 1984 87 Chevy Corvette (C4) Features: 1 Piece Monoblock, 6 Piston, 6S Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ CNC Machined from US Sourced 2618 Aluminum Forging Powder Coated Finish Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear Dual Seals, Dust Weather & Pressure 2 Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc Plate Rotor w Billet Aluminum Hat Specs: Applications Chevy Corvette 84 87 Axle Rear Brand Baer

Fits 1984-87 Chevy Corvette (C4)


Features:

  • 1-Piece Monoblock, 6-Piston, 6S Caliper Manufactured in Phoenix, AZ
  • CNC Machined from US Sourced 2618 Aluminum Forging
  • Powder Coated Finish
  • Stainless Steel Pistons, Abutments and Noise Suppression Clips
  • Staggered Pistons to Minimize Uneven Pad Wear
  • Dual Seals, Dust/Weather & Pressure
  • 2-Piece Slot, Drilled, Zinc-Plate Rotor w/Billet Aluminum Hat

Specs:

Applications Chevy Corvette 84-87
Axle Rear
Brand Baer Brakes
Caliper 6S
Caliper Color Hugger Orange
Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Piston Quantity 6
Disc Brake Caliper (Rear) Type Fixed
Disc Brake Pad FMSI Number D1247
Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Construction Vented
Disc Brake Rotor (Rear) Outside Diameter 14.000IN
Emission Code 6
Export Description Brake Components
Fitment Notes w/OE Rear Disc Brake Trailing Arms
Grade Type Performance
Hose Material Stainless Steel
Includes Park Brake No, Re-uses OE
Lug Count 5 Lug
Min Wheel Dia (verify using template) 18IN
Product Line 14 Inch Extreme+
Product Type 14 Inch Extreme+ Rear Brake Kit
Prop 65 (C, R or CR) CR
Prop 65 - Long Label WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals including Toluene Diisocyanate, and Nickel which are known to the State of California to cause cancer. For more information, visit www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
Prop 65 - Short Label WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm. www.P65Warnings.ca.gov
Prop 65 Yes/No Yes
Rotor Thickness 1.250IN
Rotor Type 2-Piece
Surface Type Slotted, Drilled & Zinc Plated
System Notes Fits 1984-87 Chevy Corvette (C4) OE Rear Disc Brake Trailing Arms
Template N085P
Title Extreme+ Brake System Rear
Wheel Lug/Bolt Pattern 5x4.75

Application:

Year Make Model Submodel
1984-1987 Chevrolet Corvette
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 98952852536

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
T
Verified Purchase
TheInternets
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 4
Nice gold paper towel holder on a budget
Color: Gold-aa
For a less expensive option I was please with the assembly and the look. It did come a little scratched but mostly in hidden spots and for the price, can’t be beat. It is not super heavy feeling though, so if you want a really solid heavy holder this might disappoint, however I like that feature since I don’t want heavy things scratching and breaking my counter or tile floor. It doesn’t wobble and I like the color so I am mostly pleased, only giving it a little less of a review because it did come a little scratched
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2026
K
Verified Purchase
Kindle Customer
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Does the job.
Works as a paper towel holder. Its a stick. It doesnt look like a cheap stick and it didn't break. Which means it met all my criteria. Great job.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
Lisa S.
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice product
Color: Gold-aa
when having guests over, it's nice for each one to use their own towel instead of having a 'community' guest towel, or those fancy ones that people feel guilty using. This solved the problem.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
A
Verified Purchase
Anonymous B
Bozeman, US
★★★★★ 5
Rich
Format: Paperback
A wonderful book that illuminates the reality of the God of Israel compared to the ANE deities.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
F. Gwin
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
Excellent. An invaluable resource!
Format: Paperback
Recently I have been reading a lot of books that have told me that the Bible's story of Adam and Eve plus the Exodus etc. are all myths that are extremely similar. Therefore, we should rethink the Bible and change our understanding of it to a more modern worldview that incorporates this knowledge and denies any sort of originality in the biblical account. John Oswalt thinks differently. He thinks that the Genesis story of origins is not some random piece of Semitic or Mesopotamian literature, but that is really unique revelation from God (and is prepared to back that statement up!). The book is divided into two sections: The Bible and Myth The Bible and History Oswalt spends the first few chapters defining the world of the Old Testament and trying to find a definition for the word myth. He comes to the conclusion that a myth "the reflection of a certain way of thinking about the world. To be sure, because of the way in which it thinks, the fantastic is often found in myth. But it is not the presence of the fantastic that makes a piece of literature myth; rather, it is the presence of the mythic worldview." This worldview, he asserts, is based off of what he calls "continuity," which he describes as "when the human, natural, and divine realms are expressed and actualized [together]." The worldview that assumes continuity is based on the here and now, and is very panentheistic. Primordial time is a key factor and the gods are dependent on the humans. This is not so with the biblical worldview. The worldview of the Bible assumes transcendence - an independent God meeting with people on his own terms. He then compares and contrasts these views and shows the real differences between stories like Enimu Elish and Genesis 1. He doesn't deny similarities in the narratives, but he shows the differences in the worldviews. He then moves on to history. Just like the word "myth," Oswalt has to define history, because how civilizations have viewed history in the past has never been the same as Western civilization views history. Then he asks whether or not the Bible is history, and whether or not it matters. He makes several great points here, one of which is that ancient annuals and chronicles never recorded the defeats of kings, yet we find Israel's holy book littered with their failures and mess ups. This is a serious deal when looking at whether or not the Bible is history, because in the ancient way of thinking this surely stands out. He then looks at other questions, like "Are Biblical Faith and Biblical History Inseparable?" and responds to some critics (including Bultmann!). He then looks into the origins of the Israelites' worldview by means of authorship. Is the Bible a late text that was updated from an older, polytheistic one? "No!" says Oswalt. He deals with critiques here as well before moving on to a brilliant conclusion where he sums up the book and gives us a view of how modernism and rationalism are taking us back to the worldview based on continuity. Overall, this was a brilliant book and I wish I had read it sooner!!! It seems like so many authors today are trying to convince us that the Bible has so much in common with the other stories of origin out of an anti-biblical or liberal worldview (like ). However, under close scrutiny these criticisms do not stand up. I thank John for this book, and I will be recommending it to countless others!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2012

recommand products