Pay in installments of $147.09 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
BMR 08-17 Challenger Bolt-On Subframe Connectors - RedExperience enhanced chassis rigidity and improved handling with the BMR 08 17 Dodge Challenger Bolt On Subframe Connectors in striking red. Designed specifically for Dodge Challengers from 2008 to 2017, these subframe connectors bolt directly onto your vehicle's frame, providing a seamless fit and superior structural support. Upgrading to these connectors reduces chassis flex, delivering more precise control during aggressive driving and cornering.
Experience enhanced chassis rigidity and improved handling with the BMR 08-17 Dodge Challenger Bolt On Subframe Connectors in striking red. Designed specifically for Dodge Challengers from 2008 to 2017, these subframe connectors bolt directly onto your vehicle's frame, providing a seamless fit and superior structural support. Upgrading to these connectors reduces chassis flex, delivering more precise control during aggressive driving and cornering.Constructed by BMR Suspension, a trusted name in high performance automotive parts, these connectors are engineered from high quality steel to ensure maximum durability and longevity. The vibrant red finish not only adds a bold touch to your engine bay area but also provides resistance against corrosion and wear, keeping your investment looking sharp for years to come.
Installation is straightforward, requiring no welding or complex modifications, which makes it ideal for enthusiasts who prefer bolt on upgrades. Whether you are upgrading your muscle car for street performance or prepping for track days, these subframe connectors are an essential chassis bracing component to enhance your Challenger's performance profile.
With Tuningsupply, you receive competitive pricing without hidden fees, fast Europe wide shipping, and expert support from fellow car enthusiasts who understand the importance of quality performance parts. Upgrade your suspension system with BMR's subframe connectors and feel the difference in your driving dynamics today.
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 6 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
So glad that I have bought these books from Amazon
Format: Paperback
Still working on getting through, I try and read more each day
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 5, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Must read
Format: Paperback
Impressive second book by Justin Driver.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 1, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Excellent!
Format: Paperback
Excellent read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2025
★★★★★ 1
A Disconnected and Legally Shaky Defense of Racial Preferences
Format: Paperback
While this book raises some thought-provoking points, it ultimately reads like a product of self-righteous elites disconnected from reality and from the American public.
1. Ignores public opinion.
The author never acknowledges that polls consistently show Americans oppose racial preferences in college admissions. Proposition 16—which would have allowed such preferences—was defeated by a wide margin in 2020 in California, one of the nation’s most liberal states. A Brookings poll found that virtually all racial groups, including Black respondents, supported the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) decision.
2. Starts with a strange premise.
The first chapter claims conservatives will “regret” the SFFA ruling because universities will continue racial preferences covertly. But that sidesteps the real question: why shouldn’t colleges comply with the ruling’s letter and spirit?
3. Offers dubious legal advice.
In Chapter Three, the author—himself a law professor—floats risky ideas for “working around” the Supreme Court’s decision. Many of these suggestions rest on shaky legal ground, as anyone familiar with the Second Circuit’s CACAGNY v. Adams, 116 F.4th 161 (2d Cir. 2024), would recognize.
4. Ignores proportionality and real-world outcomes.
The book argues for “diversity” preferences without asking how much preference is justified. In reality, Asian American applicants face steep penalties. e.g. Stanley Zhong was rejected by five University of California campuses’ Computer Science programs as an in-state applicant—shortly before Google hired him for a full-time, Ph.D.-level software engineering position. Meanwhile, UC San Diego’s own freshman math-placement data show a surge of students—mostly “underrepresented minorities” favored by UC—placed into remedial courses, some testing at a 4th-grade level. It is hard to see how admitting these students is helping them other than allowing some elites to make themselves feel good or get a promotion.
If this book represents what passes for legal scholarship at Yale, the state of American legal education should worry us all.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 12, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Adherence to the Rule of Law Must Not Become a Fair Weather Sport
Format: Paperback
The memorable quotation I have used for the title of this review comes from the second chapter (I think) of "The Fall of Affirmative Action." What is actually happening in the United States is that the law is being enforced rigorously against "enemy" institutions such as those of higher learning and not at all against those with power, money, or affinity for same.
The author, an African-American Yale Law professor, devotes his first chapter to the ways in which conservatives might critique the SCOTUS precedent that ended affirmative action and his second to the ways in which liberals might critique it. His most invaluable contribution to the debate is that civil rights can be advocated from an anti-classification standpoint or an anti-subordination standpoint, with anti-subordinationists on both sides of the affirmative action debate. This forced me to take perhaps a harder look at my own beliefs than most books or articles about affirmative action. African-Americans are certainly subordinated in reality by being excluded from higher education but they are subordinated mostly in the minds of white Americans by the fact that a white applicant with the same scores, extracurriculars and admission essays might not get in. That at least is the conclusion I have come to.
"Students for Fair Admissions," the organization that brought down affirmative action before SCOTUS, has now sued those few elite educational institutions that DIDN'T see sharp drops in their African-American enrollment. One strongly suspects that SFFA if not the "Justices" they persuaded will be happy only with a formal quota for African-Americans which is half or less their proportion in the population of the state where the institution is located.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 4, 2025
recommand products
【USA輸入】ヴィンテージ KJL フォイルガラス イヤリング/Vintage KJL Foiled Glass Clip On Earrings
18.00
【USA輸入】ヴィンテージ エメラルド クリア ビジュー リング/Vintage Emerald Clear Bijou Ring
52.00
Mountain Minimalist Wall Art II
69.99
WeatherTech 2015-2020 Ford F-150 Rear Rubber Mats - Grey
58.99
WeatherTech 09+ Ford F-150 Rear Rubber Mats - Grey
48.99