Pay in installments of $17.50 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 2 - Aug 7
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
M752 Tactical Ballistic Missile Launcher&MGM-52 Lance Missile | DRAGON 3592 1/35M752 Tactical Ballistic Missile Launcher & MGM 52 Lance Missile Launcher Combo Set DRAGON 3592 1 35 [About the actual car] The MGM 52 Lance was a mobile short range ballistic missile system deployed by the United States from 1973 to 1992, and the self propelled launcher that carried it was the M752 Lance missile launcher. The Lance missile is a rocket propelled missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, developed as a successor to the Honest John
M752 Tactical Ballistic Missile Launcher & MGM-52 Lance Missile Launcher Combo Set | DRAGON 3592 1/35
[About the actual car]
The MGM-52 Lance was a mobile short-range ballistic missile system deployed by the United States from 1973 to 1992, and the self-propelled launcher that carried it was the M752 Lance missile launcher.
The Lance missile is a rocket-propelled missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, developed as a successor to the Honest John and Sergeant, and began to be officially deployed in 1973.
Equipped with a liquid fuel rocket motor.
It could reach an altitude of 45km, had a range of 125km, and was capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.
The self-propelled missile launcher that is equipped with this Lance missile system is the M752, manufactured by LTV.
The vehicle was based on the M548, a variation of the M113 armored personnel carrier.
Its capability was said to be capable of firing three missiles per hour.
After being deployed in 1972, it was adopted not only by the United States, but also by Belgium, Germany, Israel, Italy, and other countries. 550 vehicles were produced, and together with the MGM-52 missile launcher, they played a key role during the Cold War.
[About the model]
-The model is a combo set that reproduces in 1/35 scale the M752 Self-Propelled Missile Launcher Lance, a self-propelled missile launcher developed by the US military in the 1970s, and the MGM-52 Lance Missile System, a mobile missile system.
The M752 Missile Launcher Lance not only reproduces the vehicle shape, but also the missile launcher in detail.
You can assemble it either in a moving state or in a missile launch state.
The missile launcher can be moved up and down.
In the firing position, the rear lamps of the vehicle are open and the roof of the driver's seat is lowered.
The undercarriage is realistically reproduced using NEO tracks that are partly one-piece and partly assembled.
This set also includes one MGM-52 Lance missile launcher.
The model includes one missile body and a special single-axle, two-wheel trailer.
The trailer parts accurately reproduce the mechanical structure.
Sharp details add to the realism of the model, including storage boxes and tool boxes attached to the frame, tires and wheels with reproduced tread patterns, and a wheeled jack attached to the end of the trailer frame.
Also, don't miss the detailed reproduction of the four outriggers that deploy when the missile is launched.
[Main features]
1/35 scale reproduction of the US military's M752 self-propelled missile launcher Lance and MGM-52 Lance missile launcher
The M752 vehicle body and the missiles it carries are reproduced in detail. The tracks are partly connected and partly integrated NEO tracks.
Both missiles can be elevated up and down even after completion.
The trailer parts of the MGM-52 accurately reproduce the mechanical structure.
The storage box and tool box on the frame are also modeled in detail.
The MGM-52 Lance was a mobile short-range ballistic missile system deployed by the United States from 1973 to 1992, and the self-propelled launcher that carried it was the M752 Lance missile launcher.
The Lance missile is a rocket-propelled missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead, developed as a successor to the Honest John and Sergeant, and began to be officially deployed in 1973.
Equipped with a liquid fuel rocket motor.
It could reach an altitude of 45km, had a range of 125km, and was capable of carrying a nuclear warhead.
The self-propelled missile launcher that is equipped with this Lance missile system is the M752, manufactured by LTV.
The vehicle was based on the M548, a variation of the M113 armored personnel carrier.
Its capability was said to be capable of firing three missiles per hour.
After being deployed in 1972, it was adopted not only by the United States, but also by Belgium, Germany, Israel, Italy, and other countries. 550 vehicles were produced, and together with the MGM-52 missile launcher, they played a key role during the Cold War.
[About the model]
-The model is a combo set that reproduces in 1/35 scale the M752 Self-Propelled Missile Launcher Lance, a self-propelled missile launcher developed by the US military in the 1970s, and the MGM-52 Lance Missile System, a mobile missile system.
The M752 Missile Launcher Lance not only reproduces the vehicle shape, but also the missile launcher in detail.
You can assemble it either in a moving state or in a missile launch state.
The missile launcher can be moved up and down.
In the firing position, the rear lamps of the vehicle are open and the roof of the driver's seat is lowered.
The undercarriage is realistically reproduced using NEO tracks that are partly one-piece and partly assembled.
This set also includes one MGM-52 Lance missile launcher.
The model includes one missile body and a special single-axle, two-wheel trailer.
The trailer parts accurately reproduce the mechanical structure.
Sharp details add to the realism of the model, including storage boxes and tool boxes attached to the frame, tires and wheels with reproduced tread patterns, and a wheeled jack attached to the end of the trailer frame.
Also, don't miss the detailed reproduction of the four outriggers that deploy when the missile is launched.
[Main features]
1/35 scale reproduction of the US military's M752 self-propelled missile launcher Lance and MGM-52 Lance missile launcher
The M752 vehicle body and the missiles it carries are reproduced in detail. The tracks are partly connected and partly integrated NEO tracks.
Both missiles can be elevated up and down even after completion.
The trailer parts of the MGM-52 accurately reproduce the mechanical structure.
The storage box and tool box on the frame are also modeled in detail.
( This is a machine translation. Please allow for possible misinterpretations in the text. )
Item Size/Weight : 43 x 31 x 9.4 cm / 886g
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.9 ★★★★★
Based on 19 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
One of the most poignant books I have read in a long time.
Format: Paperback
One of the most poignant books I have read in a long time.
“Southern communities, lawmakers, and courts recognized slave-owning women as individuals able to acquire and exercise mastery over enslaved people, s is evident from laws passed throughout the South. Laws dating back to the colonial period routinely recognized the mistresses owned enslaved people in their own right, and these same laws acknowledged the fact that these women were capable of exercising mastery over the enslaved people they owned.” Stephanie E. Jones - Rogers.
They were referred to as Southern Belles’. Revered for their ladylike daintiness. But… there was nothing dainty about their dealings for they too, owned human property. These white southern mistresses were heavily involved and often owned more property than their male counterparts even being the breadwinners. These women were barbaric and wore the crown of cruelty.
Dr. Rogers gave the enslaved a voice in this text – allowing our ancestors to share with us their story and experiences under the thumb of white mistresses. This text uncovers the extent of the involvement that white women had with slave ownership. There was discord in marriages due to white women struggles to maintain control of their financial gains of human property. These women utilized the judicial system to protect their pecuniary interests. The parents of these white girls/women bequeathed slaves to white females i.e. as young as newborns – which leads us to mistresses in the making – that is the education of young white women of the mastery of slave ownership. My heart broke as I was able to envision the accounts of atrocities inflicted upon our ancestors. Our people were raped and forced into being breeders and wet nurses to ensure the livelihood of these white mistresses and their families. The evidence is insurmountable in all the ways slave-owning women invested in, and profited from their financial ties to American slavery and its marketplace. Most importantly, there was testimony from formerly enslaved people of their experiences within slavery. This text is a mandatory read for all and in my opinion, must be included as part of the curriculum in schools.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 16, 2020
★★★★★ 5
Slave Trade was not only a White Man's Affair
Format: Kindle
The book is an excellent read particularly in today's climate. Why 53% of white women would put a vile man in office is explained in the pages of this book. White women held positions of power in the America slave trade, a fact overlooked in history. These southern bell's represented as the gold standard of woman hood in the antebellum south were anything but, and they for the most part showed as much, business savvy as down right cruelty in the slave trade. They benefited in every conceivable way from this free labor market. They were no advocates for the kind humane treatment of slaves. In many cases they were as vicious as their counterpart and just as committed to a keeping Blacks marred in the system of bondage. They are in most cases depicted as silent partners and where that might be the case many white women had full command and knowledge of the value of a slave they invested in and they wanted a hefty return. In fact they used every means on the table to keep these black, men, women and children bound to their wealth creation. These co-conspirators had more than a hand in the cookie jar, they enjoyed the power and did not hesitate to support the maintenance of this inhumane institution.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2019
★★★★★ 5
Excellent book, not only for lawyers or law students
To begin with, I am neither a lawyer, a law student, nor even a prospective law student. I am, however, someone who has always been interested in the law, primarily for two reasons. First, the law is the principal formal means a society uses to try to resolve conflict among the society's members. Second, and closely related to the first reason, the sum shape, both of content and procedure of the law, is an expression of exactly what a society's values are and the goals a society sets for itself or the standards by which it ideally wishes to be judged.
I found this book to be excellent, informative, well written, and even at parts entertaining. Although meant as a guide for law students to use to prepare for the strenuous exams that are associated with each course they will take in law school, the book provides much, much more, and hence my belief that it can profitably be read by a far larger readership than its ostensible audience. One of the key elements stressed throughout, and exemplified by numerous enlightening examples, is that there usually is no one correct answer to any given legal question. Arguments can be made on at least two sides of any matter based upon, for example, a "plain reading" of the text of a relevant law and the reasonably understandable intent of those who made the law (e.g., a legislature). The authors bring out clearly such sources of legal precedent as laws, government regulations, individual case law decisions by judges, common law, government policy, and specific codes (e.g., the Uniform Commercial Code, or UCC) and show how differing results to a case can readily come about based upon arguments using the different sources to bolster respective cases.
In reality, although by minimal definition a book designed, as said above, to prepare for the taking of law school tests, the book actually also is a good guideline on how to think (not necessarily what to think) about many larger issues in society, including politics and policy issues of all sorts.
Finally, the first two thirds of the book discuss ways to think about the wide range of questions that can be posed to aspiring lawyers and introduces the reader to understanding such distinctions as "forks in the law" and "forks in the facts" (a quite useful distinction to keep in mind). The final part of the book provides solid test taking strategies that are applicable to a wide range of academic testing (e.g., answer the question the professor actually asked and avoid wasting time or effort on ancillary matters not really germane to helping to resolve the issue.) Although some of these may seem obvious once read, the tips are the type of thing that, under pressure of exams, many students often forget to apply.
In sum, I highly recommend this book to those interested in life in the modern world.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 29, 2015
★★★★★ 5
Must read for 1L or Incoming Law Student! So helpful!!!
Format: Paperback
Any 1L or incoming law student needs to read this book! So, I took the BARBI Law Preview before law school began to get an overview of what law school was like and a heads up on how to do things. During this program I had read just two chapters of the book- and these two chapters alone put me in a crucial mind frame to understand the importance of what your professors are looking for. It is not just about distinguishing the right issues and facts, because there is truly no such thing, but distinguishing both sides of an issue, and of course you have to read the book to get more info, but I feel like it has helped me understand what success sounds like in exams. I am only going into my third week of 1L, but I can tell the book has given me a leg up. I recommend that you read this book before you start, or in the first two weeks (though you'll be burdened with a lot of reading then- so before is best) so you can get into the mindset, instead of doing it right before exams and feeling like you have to rewire your brain to everything you thought you understood.
I guess I'll have to update you guys once I see my exams, but so far so good!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 4, 2015
★★★★★ 4
Must-Have for Law Students
Format: Paperback
This is a good book. A lot of the trouble with law school exams is law professors are notoriously bad teachers, and these bad teachers write bad exams. Granted, this is a worst-case scenario, but if you've been to law school for more than one semester, there's a good chance that at least one of your professors has utterly bamboozled you into how he/she wants the final written. So what this book does is give you something of a blueprint and a method of examining fact patterns and exploring the question(s) so that you can simply go into the exam and take it without much fear.
Where the book fails to be of help though, is with the IRAC method. I wholeheartedly agree that IRAC is a too-constrictive method of writing that tends to inhibit most students from really expressing what they know. Law professors largely want a mechanical recitation of rules followed by mechanical analysis, so law students spend hours and hours memorizing rules with the ultimate purpose of using them in an IRAC format. It's absurd, but that's the way it is. And this book simply dismisses the fact that lazy law professors love IRAC for the fact that it gives them a template from which they can read and score exams quickly.
But still, you can construct an IRAC using this method, it just doesn't lend itself seamlessly to it, which is pathetic--not with respect to GTM, but to the teaching and testing methods used by professors. If you don't believe me, and if you haven't already done so, go look at model bar answers from your state and see if they employ a rigid IRAC formula. They don't. And so to me, that's what this book was good for--being able to write bar exam quality answers that leave room for a different writing styles and methods of analysis.
If you're just starting law school, buy this book. If you're already in and still struggling, buy this book. If you're the king or queen of fastidious, multiple, anally retentive headers on your exams, read this book and go look at bar answers.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 22, 2016
recommand products
Soup/Cereal Bowl Stacked Organic
33.00
Charger Round Coupe Plate Roda
62.00
Tropical Punch by Juiced Up Salt [ON]
33.75
envii Pond Equaliser ? Pond pH Buffer Instantly Balances, and Stabilises pH, KH and GH Levels, Pond Ammonia Remover, Works All Year Round Through
55.34
G4Free 35L Military Tactical Backpack Army Assault Molle Pack Bag Rucksack Daypack Fishing Trekking Hunting
59.86