HALDANE, J. B. S. Callinicus. In Defence of Chemical Warfare.
SKU: 78266282875

HALDANE, J. B. S. Callinicus. In Defence of Chemical Warfare.

Sale price$450.00 Regular price$500.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

HALDANE, J. B. S. Callinicus. In Defence of Chemical Warfare.Chemical Warfare Will Not Assume Importance Until the Outbreak of the Next Serious War HALDANE, J. B. S. Callinicus. In Defence of Chemical Warfare. London: Kegan Paul. 1925. Small 8vo. Publishers glazed black boards with printed labels to front board and spine, in the original printed dust jacket; pp. [viii, with initial blank], 84, [4 (blank)]; small chip to dust jacket at head of spine and small inkspot to front cover, slight foxing to top and fore

‘Chemical Warfare Will Not Assume Importance Until the Outbreak of the Next Serious War’

HALDANE, J. B. S. Callinicus. In Defence of Chemical Warfare. London: Kegan Paul. 1925.

Small 8vo. Publisher’s glazed black boards with printed labels to front board and spine, in the original printed dust-jacket; pp. [viii, with initial blank], 84, [4 (blank)]; small chip to dust-jacket at head of spine and small inkspot to front cover, slight foxing to top- and fore-edges, the odd spot internally; a very good copy.

Uncommon first edition, first printing, rare in the dust-jacket, of this curious and controversial work by one of the twentieth century’s great geniuses, polymaths and scientific minds, a cult figure since the 1920s.

John Burdon Sanderson Haldane (1892–1964), without any higher scientific degree, became one of the leading geneticists and lecturers at Cambridge and coined the terms ‘clone’ and ‘cloning’ as understood in the modern sense. A committed Marxist, his influence reached from Aldous Huxley (Brave New World) to science fiction writers such as Arthur C. Clarke, who called Haldane ‘perhaps the most brilliant science populariser of his generation’.

Writing in the aftermath of the First World War (in which he served as a captain), Haldane here examines the fifteen different types of poisonous gas used during the Great War and discusses their effects: ‘Some soldiers poisoned by these substances had to be prevented from committing suicide; others temporarily went raving mad, and tried to burrow into the ground’; in spite of this, Haldane argues that the effects are only temporary, and that the large majority of soldiers recovered after forty-eight hours. Ever the realist, he prepares his audience for the likelihood of the use of chemicals in future wars. ‘I doubt whether objecting to it [war] we are likely to avoid it in the future, however lofty our motives or disinterested our conduct.

War will be prevented only by a scientific study of its causes, such as has prevented most epidemic diseases’ (p. 3). Notably, he argues that the government should ‘seriously consider the provision of gas-masks for the population of London and other large towns, and the instruction of school-children in their use’ (p. 36), his observations preceding the UK government’s 1939 decision to issue gas masks to civilians by fifteen years. ‘If this is not done, there is at least the possibility of a disaster of the very first magnitude at an early stage in the next war’ (ibid.). He also emphasises the importance of scientific education for civilians and soldiers in preparation for future wars; his methods – if slightly unorthodox – would play a significant role during the Second World War. ‘Though I have seen a good many scientific experiments on animals, I have never seen one which […] I should object to having performed on myself’ (p. 75).

Haldane’s father, the physiologist John Scott Haldane (1860–1936), conducted extreme experiments on both himself and his son in an attempt to study gas poisoning, e.g. breathing in toxic gases in contained spaces, using his observations to develop early gas masks during the First World War. During the Second World War, J. B. S. Haldane’s own self-experiments on decompression sickness, or ‘the bends’, were instrumental in allowing him and his team to develop breathing apparatuses and miniature submarines used in the Allied landing on D-Day.

A second, revised edition appeared later in the same year, as did a New York edition published by E.P. Dutton and Co.

SKU: 2121132

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 78266282875

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 2292 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Lake Worth, US
★★★★★ 5
Must-Have for Dog Owners (Whow have dogs that like to fetch)
Style: 2.5" Ball
Soon as this launcher arrived I went outside with the dogs to try it out. Long story short: This is a great fetch toy. I am able to launch the ball pretty far with little to no effort, and picking the ball back up is as easy as grabbing it with my own hand. The toy itself is very sturdy, so much so this is the only fetch-toy I'll ever have to buy. Considering how durable it is, I don't think I'll ever need to buy a replacement. I believe Chuck-It is the most popular option, and because this is the first fetch-toy I purchased, I can't really compare it to anything else. A few outlier reviews said the ball was difficult to launch, and I have to disagree. It has been so easy to use I can't possibly see what the problem is. And no, upper body strength is not a factor as I virtually have none. People can get great distance (Half the length of a football field by my eye) in one simple, easy motion. And if other products can launch the ball farther, so what? How far is far enough? Is your dog going to throw a fit because it went 40 meters instead of 50? No. They will not. For anyone upset this toy doesn't launch far enough, ask yourself this: Is the toy for their dog? Or the human who bought it? The bottom line is this: It feels like it's built to last, it's inexpensive, and it does what it is supposed to do. So long as a toy is "good enough" I don't see the point in splitting hairs and trying to determine which fetch toy is the absolute best. Saying it's good enough is a bit misleading though. I can't imagine how a dog toy like this could be any better. It's a must-have for any dog owner. Unfortunately, only one of my pups likes to fetch...
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 6, 2020
K
Verified Purchase
K. Quaintance
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Works Like a Charm!
Style: 2.5" Ball
WoW!! This thing is pretty cool! It can pick the ball up off the ground - and with little effort - It can throw the ball 3X Higher and Further than I ever could! It wont hurt my elbow or wrist ( way better than before when I was wearing myself out ) I don’t know how I ever got along without it!! It's a must have if your dog loves playing ball. :-) Update: I've had this For 7 Months Now- it looks and works Great just like the day I bought it- Thumbs up!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 29, 2024
P
Verified Purchase
Private
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Better Design - Better Materials - No Sticking
Style: 2.5" Ball
Been using Chuck-It launchers and plastic balls for a very long time and they were always a little sticky on giving up the ball. This makes it tricky to throw grounders with precision and can overshoot the fence in the backyard. A couple of years ago, Chuck-It changed the material to a stiffer plastic that made this problem more pronounced. I even tried custom sanding the cup to get just the right grip. The Fetch-It launcher (using the Chuck-It plastic balls) uses a three-pronged claw with soft rubbery ends that releases perfect every time. The material costs on this new one are noticeably higher while maintaining a somewhat lower price than the brand name original.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 9, 2026
N
Verified Purchase
ninjitsu
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 3
Meh
Style: 2.5" Ball
It "works" but it isn't very good. The grip is so loose on the ball, it lets go early and doesn't thrown very far. A Chuckit is so much better, I can get 3x the distance with a 25" Chuckit. This thing is kind of a waste.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026
C
Verified Purchase
Chris S
Chelsea, US
★★★★★ 5
Holding up well to my dogs.
These have a squeaker inside. My dogs LOVE them. So far have held up very well. My dogs are hard on toys. The price is right. Do recommend
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 18, 2026

recommand products